Ethereum ETF approved by May 31?
$13.2M Vol.Ends 31 May 2024
$13.2M Vol.Ends 31 May 2024
This market will resolve to "Yes" if any spot Ethereum ETF receives approval from the SEC by May 31, 2024, 11:59:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". The primary resolution source for this market will be information from the SEC, however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
investicnyboh853d
So where is the approval? :D
Wrong19B4rullingEthereumETF860d
@[link removed] Are you suing yet? They fucked you over big time.
Wrong19B4rullingEthereumETF860d
When starts the ETH ETF trading since it's approved? Oh wait, because it NOT has been approved yet!
probacseresznye861d
Nos got rug pulled real hard lmfao
BookLook861d
1/2 is still not approved etf. bruh
2024.862d
It`s 1 of June, NO S-1 approved, NO Ethereum ETF approved.
McDonalds-Employee862d
Hey Polymarket, it's the first of June, where is the Ethereum ETF?
taqiMetamask862d
vpn
taqiMetamask862d
venue
taqiMetamask862d
venu
tamsamini865d
This market is all about time. The fact that ETF "will" eventually be approved does not mean that it will be approved by May 31st. Polymarket team has to be responsible for creating a market will so ambiguous rule. So disappointed to their cowardness
DonCroleone869d
Former U.S. SEC Chairman Jay Clayton said approval of trading in spot Ethereum ETFs would be inevitable, having received approval to list, but approval of the products themselves is still pending, with the expectation that the funds could begin trading in July or August. Source theblock
McDonalds-Employee869d
Agree with the outcome? The Ethereum ETF is not yet approved, who knows, might not even get approved till August, but they resolved every all ETH ETF markets to yes for no reason.
PolymarketIsWorseThanUMA870d
That clarification was rigging the shit
Nasi_Goreng870d
TIL: There seems to be a correlation between whiny bitches and bad readers
mxdvt870d
this is fraud. hope somebody sues them
elizabete870d
THe funniest thing is that you can exit the bet after a little pump contrary to traditional betting
elizabete870d
Yeaah boy!
Animal-bear870d
Congratz to all believers (especially before May 20). Well earned. I voted No, but I agree with the outcome.
BBQChickenisthebesttt870d
Dispute this. form 19b-4 is just a amendement. Official registration form S-1 is not approved whats going on here
klismannbr870d
The result of this bet is incorrect! ETH ETF has not yet been approved. It needs the S-1 documents approval i first to be tradable. I want to dispute this result!
1998870d
What woud happen if s-1 does not get approved?
DonCroleone870d
James Seyffart: "TO BE CLEAR: This does not mean they will begin trading tomorrow. This is just 19b-4 approval. Also needs to be an approval on the S-1 documents which is going to take time. We’re expecting it to take a couple weeks but could take longer. Should know more within a week or so!"
BenSimmon1870d
lol, ETF is approved but you guy still find a way to tell ETF os not approved
pollerpan870d
in other platforms it is still open because the SC1 has not yet been approved and has been confirmed by the platform, here we have only been trolled until the last moment.
ioeriwojiojewiojddsa870d
Just shut up, Ken
ImJustKen870d
Think it ultimately ended up being an expedient resolution, and a bit of a scammy resolution.
crapto_bear870d
our dearest rudev was correct, and I am rekt
MrPoopybutthole870d
Doesn't seem to matter what I do I'm always number two No one knows how hard I tried, oh-oh, I I have feelings that I can't explain Drivin' me insane All my life, been so polite But I'll sleep alone tonight 'Cause I'm just Ken, anywhere else I'd be a ten Is it my destiny to live and die a life of blonde fragility? I'm just Ken Where I see love, she sees a friend What will it take for her to see the man behind the tan and fight for me?
NowUp870d
It makes sense to require a bail like this. Otherwise everything would be disputed. For the guys with 100 or 200k bets it should be a nobrainer and a clear +ev play to dispute it!
Lobo-236870d
750 USDC to dispute? This site is rigged. (I didn't place any bet)
mostlywrong870d
Cope harder
Stos1000870d
Wrong. The argument to count as NO has enough validity. Poly market should be voiding this bet altogether on the basis that they didn’t provide enough specifity/details to a process that involves multiple steps to full approval.
aenews2870d
No, do not dispute. There is no point in doing so as the June 30 and December 31 markets have already resolved to Yes. It is impossible to resolve this market to anything else.
NowUp870d
15 minutes left. My position is not big enough for it. It should be disputed though.
papac870d
"the proposals" are 8 etf products, that they are approving
papac870d
@norisknofun the s-1 have already been filed and are going to be approved, this document is about whether the products will be approved for trade. the answer is yes
pollerpan870d
there are 20 minutes left in order to dispute it if anyone wants to do it [link removed]
McAfee870d
R u retarded?
50Whence870d
its not an approval/disapproval process
bosslyw53870d
Rigged..... What woud happen if s-1 does not get approved?
NowUp870d
The best resolution would be to make it a 50/50 split and clarify that the rules were not sufficient to select a clear winner.
McAfee870d
How convenient that the additional context just mentions half the sentence of the SEC. The full sentence is: "IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act, that the Proposals be, and hereby are, approved on an accelerated basis." This clearly indicates that the approval pertains specifically to the proposals under Section 19(b)(2) and does not encompass the entire approval process for the ETF.
NowUp870d
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,90 ... and not the whoule approval process.
papac870d
"The proposals...hereby are...approved"
papac870d
it says the etf proposals are approved in the SEC document
papac870d
"The proposals...hereby are...approved"
papac870d
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,90 that the Proposals (SR-NYSEARCA-2023-70; SR-NYSEARCA-2024-31; SR-NASDAQ-2023- 045; SR-CboeBZX-2023-069; SR-CboeBZX-2023-070; SR-CboeBZX-2023-087; SRCboeBZX-2023-095; SR-CboeBZX-2024-018) be, and hereby are, approved on an accelerated basis. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.91 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Deputy Secretary
Stos1000870d
You can dispute the final decision, please tap on dispute and login @[link removed]
truthteller870d
for all you who have no shares and are salty: bring the rules of the market and polymarket's resolution to ANY SAT/GMAT verbal professor and see what they say. Hint: everyone will agree with polymarket, because it's basic reading comprehension
bosslyw53870d
This is not final approval.
BookLook870d
In a week or a month when they accept s1 it turns out etf will be accepted a second time or maybe after all these are 2 parts of one
Qwan870d
Rule clarification didn't clarify rules, they proposed a resolution. That verbiage is biased and untrue. If you read the [link removed] linked the word approved is only listed in it once, and it's about rule changes. Not the approval of the entire ETF process?
McAfee870d
Not resolved yet, polymarket can still resolve this correctly.
aenews2870d
Too late, already resolved
NowUp870d
I think it should resolve to 50/50. Clearly, the market was ill-worded and the additional context should have been posted right after the discussion started. I admit that for people who don't know much about the listing process, it could be seen as approved, but from a regulatory perspective, it is clearly not.
Stos1000870d
Poly market needs to make this [link removed]...... etf was not fully approved yet.
